There is a lack of innovation in the communications world, as indicated by some of the industry watchers, here at techdirt and amusingly here too, around Telcos and PSTN.

What about innovation from premises based IP Telephony PBX providers, after all businesses pay through the nose for LAN and WAN upgrades and shiny new telephone systems.
Apparently though, according to Cisco at the latest presentation, the real benefits to businesses going forward are now acknowledged to be the applications and not the plumbing, and so the move towards renaming solutions from IP Telephony to Unified Communications goes on.
There is an echo here of when the department of unemployment renamed themselves to the department of employment, but the thought counts (with some honourable exceptions I know).
There’s an analogy in my previous post, and I’ll give that another go here, and compare Communications to a new kitchen (it beats using cars again). Hope i don’t overdo it..
Companies want to have a very functional kitchen (communications) arrangement - sure there are components to decide over, but the overall effect and usefulness for the whole family is paramount.
We’re looking to the plumbing companies, (Cisco IP Telephony of course) and kitchen sink and appliances manufacturers (Microsoft and other software applications) to work together. An average new kitchen is usually good value at about £10K, and you cut your cloth accordingly.
Trouble is, we already have a deal in place for new appliances - so we’re slightly caught out in the investment stakes already.
What we really want is the kitchen sink to plug into the existing plumbing, and have enough left over for the 5 ring hob in a central island with a groovy extractor (sorry).
We don’t really want to have to renew all the plumbing in the house, but we will if it makes a big difference to the overall effect - maybe.
The existing old pipes currently do not work with our new appliances (we can’t even click to dial) - so what are the options?
Do the new pipes work with the new appliances? Not without an adaptor - and how much does the adaptor cost, well, how about £40K? I heard this actual figure from a prospect recently, so it is heresay, but to open an API port…it’s a bit steep isn’t it…just for an adaptor?
£40K?
Ah.
So, the old pipes don’t enable the new appliances, but the new pipes don’t either? It actually stinks, but then badly put together plumbing can do that can’t it.
IPT manufacturers seem to want innovation, but only if it has their label on it. Fine, but it’s like buying a car, and being charged twice as much if you want someone elses steering wheel. It just ain’t the way to win loyalty. Get real.
If you don’t believe me - see what it costs if you want to plug a SIP phone into a Cisco Unified Communications manager. The software port licence cost to connect the SIP phone is SIX times the cost of connecting their own phone. I was there when they explained this to a frankly silent room of customers.
Also, does a SIP server expose telephony endpoint status….only in a very limited way, and not so anything extremely useful can be deployed.
Developers steer well clear in this sort of commercial environment, and innovation is effectively stifled until the IP Telephony companies get around to integrating that new company they bought.
Sorry, correction, integrating six new competing and conflicting architecture companies they bought.
In this sort of environment, it does seem ripe for a change.